![]() To suggest he is having difficulty adapting to being a physical child again is a real stretch. The character presented makes absolutely no sense when compared with the character developed at the end of the first film. Whether he appreciated the changes made to Peter or not, he was acting blind, and, surely, it is up to the director to ensure that there is an appropriate consistency in the portrayal. As an eldest child I feel compelled to defend the actor portraying Peter as he can hardly have recognised the character he was playing from the book. There has been a fair amount of criticism of this film's actors on this board. Enough about the authenticity of the film. I'm afraid the liberties taken by this film version distort the family relationships as well as rendering other characters completely unfaithful in that context. I have seen the first film and believe the last 15 minutes reasonably reflected the Pevensie children as I imagined them from reading the second book. I am that rare person who managed to read Prince Caspian without having read The LWW. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |